Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crime of conscience

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:18, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crime of conscience

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not understandable, current article will not be of help for writing proper article 草花 (talk) 20:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This is a poor machine translation of ja:確信犯. No opinion on if the legal concept is real or not. —Farix (t | c) 14:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Civil Disobedience. Edward321 (talk) 23:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing in the article worth salvaging, and don't redirect. The concept is already covered under Civil disobedience. --MelanieN (talk) 16:16, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice. While I agree with MelanieN that there isn't really anything worth salvaging and that a redirect should not be made, I do not think the Civil disobedience article adequately covers the subject. Civil disobedience, which more often than not refers to non-violent action, is only one form of a crime of conscience. Location (talk) 17:18, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.