Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical applied linguistics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Applied linguistics without prejudice against a future spinout, once content and sourcing support this. Owen× 15:39, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Critical applied linguistics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I dont see it much mentioned Historyexpert2 (talk) 01:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 05:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. In addition to work written or co-authored by Alastair Pennycook, there are also numerous independent articles, including
    • Carlson, Matthew. "A critical look at the construction of power between applied linguistics and critical applied linguistics." International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14, 2 (2004): 167-184. HTML
    • Mahboob, Ahmer, and Brian Paltridge. "Critical discourse analysis and critical applied linguistics." The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley Blackwell (2013). PDF
    • Iyer, Radha, Margaret Kettle, Allan Luke, and Kathy Mills. "Critical applied linguistics." The Routledge companion to English studies, pp. 317-332. Routledge (2014). PDF
    • Talmy, Steven. "Critical research in applied linguistics." Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Resource, pp. 153-168. Bloomsbury (2015). GBooks preview
    • Bouchard, Jeremie. "Critical applied linguistics." JALT Journal 44, 1 (2022): 153-169. PDF
Cnilep (talk) 07:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cinder painter (talk) 08:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.