- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Crow face (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
AfD'd for another user. Article apparently is WP:OR. I have no opinion on it, just listing per a private request. ScarianCall me Pat 21:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per it being an orphaned article and being full of original research. This part may be my own POV, but this article is ridiculous and is not even true. Not to mention it's really short. Did I mention it's not true? Sounds like someone made it up and then a few others added stuff in thinking it was a real term. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 01:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:OR. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 03:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the references given don't support the existence of any such term; indeed, two of them are pictures lacking any explanation. Mangoe (talk) 04:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 14:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, OR, no sources. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 22:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.