- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cryptzone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Small non notable company. Vazom (talk) 22:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC) — Vazom (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There are 72 GNews hits for Cryptzone, 121 for "Secured eMail", the company's previous name. Edward321 (talk) 04:33, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The article needs to be improved, but the company seems to be notable. Dewritech (talk) 16:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.