Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crysmal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crysmal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Crysmal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:GNG, as it cites no non-primary sources. It also fails WP:PLOTONLY, as it provides no real-life context other than the publication history. Not a very active user (talk) 06:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 06:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 06:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 06:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete For reasons mentioned above and also because this stub has no potential to become a full article WP:ARTDEVSulfurboy (talk) 07:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per WP:GAMEGUIDE and this has no notability outside of the game guide. Also to note I appear to have a very similar username to the above editor. I though it was me for a minute! Oh dear! -- Sirfurboy (talk) 12:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. DnD cruft, hopefully this year we can de-MonsterManual Wikipedia. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:22, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:FANCRUFT Chetsford (talk) 21:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Very minor creature with virtually no sources outside of the primary sources already being used in the article. Fails the WP:GNG by a wide margin. Rorshacma (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Many of the sources come from the company that made the game, which mean the article is primary sourced. From Analog Horror, (talk to me) 20:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Analog Horror[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.