- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — ξxplicit 01:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- CrystalDiskInfo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no articles and no reviews. This software fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 21:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I found over 3,000,000 Google hits. However, I'll admit that a lot of them are probably duplicates. --Ixfd64 (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Google hits do not show notability. As an admin, you should know that. SL93 (talk) 20:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Virtually no content, no sources, and no assertion of notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:45, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 21:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete fails WP:GNG. No in-depth sources. LibStar (talk) 14:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing depth of coverage. I'm not quite sure how it gets so manner hits with so little real content, maybe clever marketing? Stuartyeates (talk) 07:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Only trivial coverage so passes no WP:N criteria. Google hits are not references and cannot impart notability. WP:GNUM is a good essay to read. Jay Σεβαστόςdiscuss 14:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.