- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. hoax DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Crystal ace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only use of the term "acetomorpian" to be found on the internet is this article. The only use of the term "crystal ace" as an illegal or abused substance is this article. I suspect a hoax. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - First, I don't think this is a hoax per say, but rather something made up one day. Regarding acetomorpian, I strongly believe this is a misspelling of acetaminophen, which redirects to the Paracetamol article (also referenced in crystal ace). Second, the account obviously has WP:COI given it is the same name as the article (and I am guessing the person who "discovered" this drug combination). Finally, the account that created the article is WP:SPA. Given the zero sources for use of this street name, I think that at this time, this new street drug is not notable enough for inclusion into Wikipedia. Turlo Lomon (talk) 20:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think "acetomorpian" is a pretty unlikely misspelling for "acetaminophen". However, in the very unlikely event that it is such a mis-spelling then the article is a hoax, since acetaminophen is a synonym of paracetamol, while the article describes a drug with very different properties from paracetamol. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if it was 'created in early 2011' it cannot possibly have gained any notability yet as evidenced by the lack of citations.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 21:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Almost certainly a hoax, and certainly not notable. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per G3 (hoax). No possibility this is factual.Novangelis (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.