Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal of Ultimate Vision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick 12:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal of Ultimate Vision

nn fictional item, pure fancruft, fails WP:V, WP:FICTION, WP:NOT, and possibly WP:NOR merge somewhere if there is any useful info or delete-- Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a fan-fiction, or something. Anyway, violates WP:NOT and original research. --Wafulz 04:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 07:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into one of the X-Men or Marvel Comics articles, after trimming and seriously condensing, if an appropriate one can be found - it's a Marvel Universe plot device, but it's really not important/notable enough to warrant it's own article. Delete if no suitable article exists. --Mrph 08:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:V, WP:FICTION, WP:NOT, and WP:NOR. A reason these fan pages keep getting deleted is that they appear to be written from someone's personal memory of the topic. There might be something that we are overlooking. For example, look at today's featured article, The Adventures of Tintin. It became a featured article, even though it links to the troubled article Secondary characters and settings in The Adventures of Tintin. Is there some special Wikipedia rule for fan pages? I don't know of any so I believe that delete is appropriate here. It's unfortunate that many of these fan pages have to be deleted. There probably is valid, factual information in the article that would permit the article to survive AfD if an editor did the leg work and provided footnotes. Keeping these troubled fan pages and giving featured article status to articles that link to these troubled fan pages only encourages more problem pages, results in more AfD work, and creates more disappointed editors whose hard work continues to be deleted because it is allow to exists and grow in the first place. -- Jreferee 18:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.