Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubbie occurrence
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:39, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cubbie occurrence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. Delete.
Also nominating
Cubbie occurance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) of which this is merely a copy.already speedied g7 Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Delete - Non notable neologism. Rob Banzai (talk) 17:18, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of mainstream usage; only one article about a single quote from the Cubs' manager. — C.Fred (talk) 17:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sources, doesn't make much sense when skim reading, can't see why this should be kept any longer. A Prodigy Sign Here/Contact 18:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the article: "Lou Pinella coined this term in the 2008 MLB season" Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not delete this article - it's a new saying. It has already caught on with fans (of which there are millions of Cubs fans around the globe), even though it's a new saying. It will continue to become a used reference, and eventually will be part of pop culture. Just because I was the first to note in it Wiki is not a reason it should be deleted. - 9 if by Darkness
- You say it's a new saying. You say eventually it will be part of pop culture. Those are reasons why now is not the right time for an article on this in Wikipedia. But if you can find a reliable source to back up your claim that it is already widespread with Cubs fans, the article may be kept. You might want to look into WP:SCRABBLE. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 00:53, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per 9 if by Darkness who unwittingly provided the perfect Delete rationale. JuJube (talk) 04:10, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 7 gnews hits + 48 non-wiki ghits add up to not widely used. (And this from a rabid Cubs fan). If it has legs beyond this season and becomes notable, recreate then. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per Blanchard above. Not notable enough yet, and if the article stays, it needs some clean up. User:MrMarkTaylor What's that?/What I Do/Feed My Box 23:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.