- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 07:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- CubeSpawn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable product, fails WP:GNG Mtking (talk) 03:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Based on some brief research, this topic does not satisfy the WP:Notability requirement. --Noleander (talk) 01:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not notable after searching for reliable sources. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 01:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.