Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cucumber (BDD Framework)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cucumber (BDD Framework)

This article is about a nonnotable BDD framework. I've looked around on the internet (the place where this would be most popular) and I wasn't able to find any reliable sources that discuss this product in a nontrivial manner, as required by WP:N. The external links are to the official website and an ad. Them From Space 19:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Frankly, I've no idea what this is. WP is about as technologically advanced as I get. However, there seems to be a lack of sources. The article doesn't help me understand what it is, nor does anything I can find on the web. Saying that, since I'm not knowledgeable on the subject, I'm reluctant to cast a "delete" vote. HJMitchell You rang? 19:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possible speedy delete for having so little context as to be unintelligible. We do have an article on behavior driven development which is enough to tell me that this article is about some non-consumer programming development or supervision software or philosophy. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 18:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, what little content there is is a copyvio of the official website (linked in the article). SpinningSpark 20:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.