Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultour+

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion (G12). (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 17:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cultour+

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, promotional, unsourced Kleuske (talk) 10:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:31, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The only coverage I can find is in this paper which seems to be written by the Cultour+ folks(?). Unfortunately, the lead of the current Cultour+ article is taken verbatim from the paper linked above. Ajpolino (talk) 02:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy What isn't copy pasted from above is copy pasted from http://culture-routes.net/council-of-europe/epa. Already nominated for G12. TimothyJosephWood 20:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.