Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural Development Fund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:27, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Development Fund

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cultural Development Fund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no RS content about this organization on which to build a NPOV-compliant and encyclopedic article. If there is anything worth keeping, it can be merged with Quality of Life Program 2020 (Saudi Arabia) which is what this program is part of. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:05, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.