- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Culver's menu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete menu for fast-food restaurant chain. Mindmatrix 21:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Stong Delete: A menu for a restuarant. I don't think that it should be redirected to the restaurant article because it isn't a likely search term. Schuym1 (talk) 00:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Who on earth would want to look at a restaurant menu on Wikipedia? Plus, in what way is this particular menu notable? It is only the restaurant that is notable, not the menu. gm_matthew (talk) 00:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And plus, for all we know the menu could change tomorrow, making this article out-of-date. gm_matthew (talk) 00:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I love Culver's as much as most Wisconsinites, but this is too much. You can look up their menu on their website and it's probably better organized. Nate • (chatter) 05:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete (G11) — Last time I checked when I went to a Culver's (best food ever! IMO), they did not serve spam. MuZemike (talk) 20:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Should have been speedied, this article is a menu (product brochure), it is pure unverified spam that does nothing more than promote an entity, delete as per G11. - DustyRain (talk) 05:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.