Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cunt in the face

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly written article, very dictionary like and non notable neologism Matthew Fenton (t) 12:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 12:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete just because..Williamb 12:54, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the article: "Origin unknown but thought to be product of slightly drunken conversation among members of OUHC Occasionals 2005/6." See WP:NFT. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above Tom Harrison ^Talk 13:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because it is nonsense (Origin unknown but thought to be product of slightly drunken conversation, heh <_< ) -- Grafikm_fr ^(AutoGRAF) 13:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete WP:CSD G2 - Test Page no other edits by article's creator, speedy and move on - Politepunk 13:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up in school (or college) one day.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  14:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not sure it meets WP:CSD, but I wish it did. --Allen 14:27, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can verify usage in several contemporary sources; largely undeground usage. Started as student slang, although notably in more common use since the start of the year.

• Delete --Terence Ong 14:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete, nonsense and too dictionarish. —N-true 15:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete if the "first recorded use" is May 3, 2006, I think we can stand to wait for this to catch on before giving it a WP article. Mangojuice^talk 16:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete --GTubio 19:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 23:27, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Smack in the face, then delete. Nonsensical. Buchanan-Hermit™..SCREAM!!!.... 00:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per MangojuiceDeathawk 04:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NFT. -- ReyBrujo 20:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.