Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cursor (typewriters)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cursor (typewriters) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I feel that the short length of this article makes it redundant to the larger article, Typewriter. Oddbodz (talk) 19:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It's nothing more than a definition of one small part of a typewriter and not really capable of being anything more than a stub. I wouldn't even change it to a redirect because it is not reasonable to foresee anyone even typing this into a search query.Agent 86 (talk) 00:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a manual.  Since not all typewriters have cursors, this article may have had a point that became lost by not listing references.  Unscintillating (talk) 07:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.