Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cushoon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was transwiki.. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cushoon

WP:NOTDIC, no sources 龗 (talk) 12:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand Easily expandable DGG (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki as dicdef. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Wiktionary and delete. It's all well and good to say something's expandable, but that generally ends up in it getting tagged {{expand}} and left alone as a permanent substub for another two years. Let's not have that. If someone wants to create a substantial article on the subject, let them do so. Stifle (talk) 11:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki and delete I am sure that an encyclopedic article could be written about every word in the dictionary. That said, few people bother. Until and unless somebody bothers, this belongs in Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. Ray^Talk 18:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki and delete. This is not something that an article can be written about easily, in fact, if at all, the article would be Tippu Sultan's military structure or something like that and this would just form a section. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.