- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- CustomerGauge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about a company that does not meet either the general notability guidelines, nor the one specifically for companies. The 4 references in the article are (1) not a reliable sources, (2),(3) press releases, (4) the company's web site. I can find no independent coverage myself. -- Whpq (talk) 18:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. Nothing but press releases at Gnews. Nothing on Google but the company's website and this article. --MelanieN (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.