Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CustomerXPs Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the notability through reliable sources is lacking. Courcelles 20:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CustomerXPs Software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article re-created after speedy deletion. Another advertisement for a non-notable business providing real-time intelligent Customer Experience Management solutions that are focused on delivering a multidisciplinary approach encompassing varied fields, such as, computer science, artificial intelligence, probability and statistics, psychology and behavior analysis. Full of text that won't clean up, it's rosy but meaningless:

A customer experience management solution which brings human like tacit, actionable and contextual conversational intelligence to every customer interactions at various touch point (tellers, branch managers, relationship managers, call centre agents, direct channels etc.) of the bank, in real-time. It brings the collective real-time intelligence of the customer, cross pollinated from multiple backend systems is always available on tap to maximize value from each customer interaction.
Both these products are distinguished in their capability to bring real-time actionable intelligence refactoring real-time data resulting in relevance and context, previously untapped by enterprise solutions.

Referenced only to blog entries, routine announcements of financing, and a directory listing for the founder. I find nothing better. Recommend protection against re-creation. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.

Delete per lack of solid sources. On a Yahoo! search, I only found two articles: here and here, and the Google search showed same links. SwisterTwister talk 01:19, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"'Modify"' This article is about a hybrid technology in Predictive analytics. This topic real Time intelligence has been discussed by many analytics companies including SAS, Tibco etc. The concept and technology is not new but the approach and solution is interesting. This article can be modified to be more of a information stuff about real time intelligence and the growing importance of Customer Experience in Banking ___domain. The information is more than useful in terms of their application and tools used for it.

All the sources cited are reliable and the many of the major media has wrote about them, [EconomicTimes], [Businessworld], [VCcircle], [TimesofIndia] etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suman365 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable business Bentogoa (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as un-salvageable advertising. If the article is actually supposed to be about a particular technology then any content regarding that subject should be added elsewhere. Several Times (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - advertising, created by a now-blocked SPA, primarily edited by a different SPA. Dialectric (talk) 11:11, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article Modified This article has been modified with information from all reliable sources, which are cited in the article. The major sources are from:The Economic Times The Times of India Business World The wall Street Journal (Live Mint)The Financial Express India Infoline DARE Magazine

This article is eligible to stay as all the sources cited in this article are the reliable and top media houses in India Jitheshcxps (talk) 09:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Note: I have relisted this AfD in good faith post the claimed additions of additional sources by a commenting editor. If no comments are forthcoming to keep the article, the article may be deleted still, irrespective of the addition of sources, as consensus till now is clearly for deleting the article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 03:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Routine business page announcements like announcements of financing generally do not count much for notability, nor do trade-related blogs or interviews with company personnel. That last article, in the Economic Times, is dated to May 2011 and calls this business a "raw startup". - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:00, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Wp:notability potential is unclear. But it has little or content worth worrying about keeping while such evidence is developed. Once the pure PR/ advertising /sales material is taken out there will be like one sentence left. North8000 (talk) 18:22, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article This company is listed as a NASSCOM member here. The article seems to address basic information only and not sure what north8000 is referring to since media houses cited are well known and reliable.59.97.58.38 (talk) 11:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.