Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cut-Tex PRO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-Tex PRO

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can only find press releases or regurgitated press releases about this company/product. Sam Walton (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 19:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 23:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:13, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as mentioned, not yet a solidly notable article. SwisterTwister talk 01:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no secondary sources, blatantly spammy and probably a copyvio from a company brochure. Best Regards, Bfpage |leave a message 01:34, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The only external links seem to be pages of the PPSS Group, a British company which tries to market this fabric as an improved alternative to Kevlar. The topic might be notable, but the lack of third-party sources certainly raises a red flag. Dimadick (talk) 10:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.