Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cut and Run (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and Run (game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A somewhat short lived board game that doesn't seem to have ever garnered any notability. Only two sources are present on the page as it is, and one of them is the defunct official site. The other gives no notable coverage, and merely lists the stats of the game. I did a pretty extensive search, and I was unable to find a single source speaking of the game. The information present on BoardGameGeek mentions several other names and publishers associated with the game, so I tried looking for sources for these varients, also with no success. With no sources, this does not pass the GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 22:22, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete hard title to search for, so there may well be reliable sources I'm missing. But it's BGG ranking and the like indicate it's probably not a notable game. Hobit (talk) 22:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I did find this review but the site is minor and it's unclear what editorial oversight is made on submissions. In any case, a single review from a minor web site is far below the coverage needed. -- Whpq (talk) 15:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 07:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.