- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Userify. Courcelles (talk) 04:11, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- CyaSSL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotion for non-notable software product. Have not found any significant independent coverage. Haakon (talk) 16:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no significant coverage in reliable sources. --Nuujinn (talk) 21:34, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that this article needs more reliable sources. Could you please move this article back into my User Space? Thanks. Chris conlon (talk) 17:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.