Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cybercartography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cybercartography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has failed to address the guidance for neologisms. In particular this article has been tagged as such for 15 months with no additional sources to show widespread coverage of this term apparently coined and promoted by Taylor. Searches in Google are mostly circular with no matches in Google News and matches in Google Books appear to point back to Taylor. Ash (talk) 13:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 15:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: From my own experience in cartography in the US, this term is in use but not common. I don't think you would encounter it often outside the field. Suggest merging with Cartography. Significant information here could be incorporated under 'technological changes,' or a 'multimedia' section could be added with more information.--Sainge.spin (talk) 01:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.