- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Cybercorrection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable neologism WuhWuzDat 19:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not only is it a neologism, but it is original research as well. Cullen328 (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 03:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 03:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep - perhaps in need of a rewrite and sourcing. but deletion.no--BabbaQ (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no claims of notability. MLA (talk) 22:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.