Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cybernetics Oriented Interpreter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems to be OR, and not notable enough anyway. - Ta bu shi da yu 20:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cybernetics Oriented Interpreter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Another technological invention of fringe notability. Fails WP:NOTE, WP:OR (article created by same person who wrote the main paper on the subject): [1]. The Evil Spartan 15:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not notable, self publishing, does that make it OR as well? I believe that developing your own compiler or interpreter is a common compsci degree task these days, which makes any single one of them a very small fish in a very big pond unless it can be shown that the computer language concerned is achieving widespread acceptance and use. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 02:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per WP:OR and self-publicity as well. Niaz^{(Talk • Contribs)} 08:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.