Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyclone3 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone3

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Cyclone3
• Articles for deletion/Cyclone3 (2nd nomination)

Cyclone3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another CMS. No sign of it meeting WP:NSOFT. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  21:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - CMS software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. An article on this CMS was deleted at previous Afd in 2009 as non-notable. A search did not turn up any significant RS coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Notability is missing, only one reference of its own website like this. No independent source found for this language. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 10:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.