- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Cynical Orange (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I cannot find an assertion of notability. At the very least, it needs to be completely rewritten. THobern 17:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- I've just realised that the whole thing is a word for word plagiarism, although it does give a misleading citation.--THobern 19:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. —ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 18:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Appears to be nn manga. Stifle (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lack of reliable sources to establish notability. No evidence that it can pass WP:BK or WP:N. --Farix (Talk) 03:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Could somebody with the know how please delete this then? Thanks.--THobern 13:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- If consensus decides to delete, then the closing administrator will delete the article. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 01:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, cheers.--THobern 11:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by THobern (talk • contribs)
- Could somebody with the know how please delete this then? Thanks.--THobern 13:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 01:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.