- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as unremarkable MySpace band. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cyster Scalpel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Clearly fails WP:BAND. Created by User:Cyst, which could be a conflict of interest. SnottyWong talk 02:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 02:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 03:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - Looks like A7 to me. smithers - talk - sign! 05:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm not finding in-depth coverage for this band; appears to fail WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 06:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.