Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D3T

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:45, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

D3T

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

D3T (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NCORP. Article was originally created with a controversy section, which was later removed. BEFORE found a Daily Telegraph article, but it focuses more on the general industry. IgelRM (talk) 19:23, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and United Kingdom. IgelRM (talk) 19:23, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:24, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Keywords Studios#Operations. Being a work for hire studio there aren't many suitable games' articles for a proper redirect. Go D. Usopp (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Fine with redirect but the reasoning appears arbitrary; even without full creative control, I imagine they did significant work on games. IgelRM (talk) 06:08, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 03:53, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete on current sourcing as well short of WP:NCORP. My thoughts in WP:NOTWORK are that developer pages with little to no specific background content don't merit an article, as is the case here. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk)
• Delete I'm unable to locate any sources that meet GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 10:36, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.