- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP since cleaned up is now verifiable and NPOV -Docg 22:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's an ad; fails all the criteria of WP:CORP Mikker (...) 21:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this ad. Doczilla 01:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable and verging on spam. - WJBscribe (WJB talk) 06:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I managed to find some coverage by reliable, third-party published sources and have added them to the article. I also removed the long, unverified list of product offerings that smacked of advertising. The article obviously needs additional work, but I believe the company barely meets the notability criteria of WP:CORP. -- Satori Son 03:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.