- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was RENAME -- 9cds(talk) 01:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been superceded by the Dewey Decimal Classification and Library of Congress Classification articles. As for now, it's just a target for maintenance bots and community fix efforts; it hasn't had a real updated in months. The topic name isn't something anyone would search for, and as a result there's no organic links to the topic. The humane thing to do is to put it down. --Mikeblas 02:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as listcruft or merge to Library of Congress Classification/Dewey Decimal Classification--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 02:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. SM247 02:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to Comparison of Dewey and Library of Congress subject classification, add an introductory paragraph, and link from the DDC and LOC articles. Actually this is quite a useful chart comparing Dewey Decimal subject classification with that of the Library of Congress. I am not sure exactly what is meant by 'listcruft', but I have noted many useful lists in the Wikipedia. I must disclose that I have a library degree, so I may not be unbiased. Bejnar 03:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename as above. --MaNeMeBasat 04:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename per Bejnar. Provides somewhat usefull information not found in the other two articles. Also needs to be linked to from the DDC and the LOC articles Ydam 08:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename per Bejnar. its not the sort of thing which would get updated often but its still useful --Astrokey44 13:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename as per above. This information looks very useful (and would otherwise be out of place on either of the DDC and LoCC articles). Merits its own article. — TheKMantalk 23:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename as above Eluchil404 21:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.