- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete by Andrew Lenahan (CSD A1). howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 00:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
vanity Mayur 19:06, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete doesn't even attempt to be encyclopedic. --MisterHand 19:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete vanity page. Had been created twice today by a user of that name, deleted twice (once by me); this was recreated again within minutes of the last deletion by a user with a new login.... Malcolm Farmer 19:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and padlock - too many reasons for deletion to be ignored (POV, vandalism, unencyclopedic...) -- one sentence does not a sentence make, "resurrection" of a deleted article.... B.Wind 20:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy deleted by me, criterion A1, no context, no content. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.