Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJabberd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:28, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DJabberd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be particularly notable. Sources are GitHub links and documentation. I can't find many secondary sources talking about this past message boards. Discant X 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 16:46, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent WP:RS coverage in multiple sources. Github is user-editable and not a reliable source, and the O'Reilly Media book only mentions DJabberd briefly on page 253, borderline significant coverage and on its own not sufficient to establish notability.Dialectric (talk) 04:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.