- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- DLOL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTDICT. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 19:09, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:05, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete—unencyclopedic dictionary definition of dubious reality. i cleaned it up a little because i couldn't help myself, but it was in no way an attempt at rescue, which isn't possible IMHO. OMG, DLOL!!!— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 20:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article is a dictionary definition for a term that fails to meet the general notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 02:42, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.