Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DON'T DO IT Campaign

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (X! · talk)  · @192  ·  03:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DON'T DO IT Campaign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be one individual's campaign; Google shows very few links to the main website for this campaign, and I couldn't find anything looking like reliable sources for it (and the article contains no sources at all.) --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 07:52, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:ORG. Also, the "sources" are downright nonsensical: for example, they cite the main page of walmart.com to prove... um, what, exactly? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:52, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not yet notable. If this campaign is reported on by the news media, etc. then WP should have an article on it, but not before. Steve Dufour (talk) 17:52, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - I managed to find two sources which go into this campaign in depth and I'm sure I could find more. I've added the two I found to the article. If I find more I'll be changing this from a weak keep to a keep. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:56, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Sources turned out to be less reliable than I thought. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 14:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't have Lexis/Nexis access; is that Business Wire link something other than a press release from Consolidated Skateboard? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't come up on Lexis as a PR release. I'll post up some of the article so you can judge for yourself. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 21:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 22:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hm....Here's the whole thing. You sure that's not a press release? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:55, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's a press release. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 14:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.