Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXMC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 13:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DXMC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced, does not appear to be a notable or important radio station. Stifle (talk) 11:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see anything satisfying WP:GNG here.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —Deor (talk) 12:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The almost invariable result at AfD is that verifiable licensed radio stations are kept. I don't see any reason for this to be an exception merely because it's located in the Philippines. A 5,000-watt AM station is usually a fairly major operation. Deor (talk) 12:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seconded. A-Day ^(c)_(t) 03:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Covered in Stay tuned: the golden years of Philippine radio. Colonel Warden (talk) 00:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.