Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dadabase (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was deleted before at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dadabase. The only reason I'm bringing it here instead of zapping it myself is because this has a few assertions of notability the previously deleted version did not. If they can be cited, this can be kept only if it is cleaned up. Otherwise, it should be deleted. No opinion. Grandmasterka 02:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Pretty insignificant presence in Vancouver. Nice piece of listcruft at the end of the article. Agent 86 03:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. No real presence on Google--not seeing anything that could be cited that would meet WP:V and WP:RS. And I'll take Agent86's word on their presence in Vancouver. -- H·G (^words/_works) 04:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:NN. Also, if anyone wants to slap on a speedy delete tag, its fails under g-4 of WP:CSD. SynergeticMaggot 04:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I already explained why I didn't delete it myself as that in my nomination. Grandmasterka
• Delete. Assertions of notability, yes. Verifiable notability, no. A search of Grove Art Online yields no results - if anything art-related is notable, it is in there. --Aguerriero (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. From what I can gather by looking at 100-150 google summaries, it is a clothing store in Vancouver with an art gallery in the back. It has gotten some local buzz, but not enough to be notable. Ted^Talk/_{Contributions} 05:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.