Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daemon Vector

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – Joe (talk) 00:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daemon Vector

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable video game, I could only find one reliable source in a review by JeuxVideo. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Might be a title/translation issue. I can't review at work, but "demon vector" (rather than "daemon vector") has some interesting hits that I think should be investigated. This is probably a redirect to the publisher/developer even so, but I'll check back later. --Izno (talk) 13:38, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to XPEC Entertainment after review. --Izno (talk) 15:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Izno: There has never been any indication that XPEC Entertainment is notable enough for an article as it is. You might want to make sure that article itself isn't a candidate for deletion._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Zxcvbnm: You are free to start that AFD if you think that will convince me to change my opinion. I prefer redirection to deletion, and unless there's a PROD about to expire or an AFD likely to close as delete, I see no reason to do otherwise. --Izno (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 11:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.