Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily-Update Publishers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Daily-Update Publishers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It fails WP:N ,WP:ORG the article is clearly promotional and created by users with a conflict of interest. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Entries in a bunch of directories does not suffice. -- Whpq (talk) 17:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 05:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination Nick-D (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.