- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Kevin (talk) 04:31, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- DaisyDisk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software article. All sources are catalogs, download databases, etc, not RS, and not significant coverage. Miami33139 (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Joe Chill (talk) 23:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: As mentioned above plenty of reviews and news about it on blogs such as [6], [7], and even some from other countries. Some of the software catalogs in the source's also have an editor's review of them. - EdoDodo talk 06:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Blogs are not reliable sources that show notability. Miami33139 (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well the two blogs I linked a fairly well-known blogs about Mac. Not private/self-published blogs either. - EdoDodo talk 06:58, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Blogs are not reliable sources that show notability. Miami33139 (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are plenty of news sources covering this, as Google News search does clearly indicated. Mac Plus [8] is one good example. Use Google news search next time, before you nominate something. Dream Focus 16:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That article on Mac Plus is about the software "Space in Time" but this deletion discussion is about the software "DaisyDisk." Did you mean to link to something else? The google news results I see are all very short or version announcements which are insignificant and do not show notability. Miami33139 (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per precedent set for such articles... and why are there so many Russian authors covering this software? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:40, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As mentioned in the history section of the article the two developers are Taras Brizitsky and Oleg Krupnov, who from their names sound Russian. - EdoDodo talk 15:41, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Which could explain that a g-search for news brings up so many non-english sources. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, but plenty of English sources show up too. - EdoDodo talk 06:24, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Which could explain that a g-search for news brings up so many non-english sources. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As mentioned in the history section of the article the two developers are Taras Brizitsky and Oleg Krupnov, who from their names sound Russian. - EdoDodo talk 15:41, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.