Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan and Ken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dan and Ken (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Previously speedy deleted per A7, the article has been recreated. While the radio station is indeed notable, notability does not necessarily flow down to programs on that station. While the article makes claims of notability, these are unsourced. Mattinbgn/ ^talk 12:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn/ ^talk 12:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom, a fair call on cascading notability not applying here. No establishment of notability for the individual show, no reliable sources to back up claims, I could go on but i'll label it WP:VSCA and be done. Thewinchester ^(talk) 13:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I am inclined to agree with all points made so far. On top of that, I haven't been able to find any RS and, frankly, didn't expect to find any. The hosts wouldn't have passed WP:NOTRSH (which is defunct) and don't seem to pass WP:BIO. I'd say that if they make it big, they certainly should have their own article but, at this point in time, I believe their Myspace page and the station's website to be a more appropriate venue. So, yeah, delete. --Seed 2.0 14:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BIO - Should be a paragraph or sentence under the relevant radio station's page, not an article. Orderinchaos 22:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; no RS turned up in search. John Vandenberg 00:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no RS.Garrie 01:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment if you can provide RS for their being finalists you will probably find sufficient sources for each presenter to pass WP:BIO. Unless of course, nominations are based on "your own station nominates every show for every eligible award"Garrie 01:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as per Thewinchester above. Lankiveil 13:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.