Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dane Cook: Vicious Circle
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dane Cook: Vicious Circle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a promotional ad for Dane Cook. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PÆonU (talk • contribs)
- Keep I removed the ridiculous swear-word tally/trivia section. What remains is a decently sourced article on an album released on a notable label by a notable act, backed up with a review to Allmusic and at least one other source. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and [7]. Joe Chill (talk) 20:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the significant coverage cited by Joe Chill. Jujutacular T · C 21:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular T · C 21:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per above. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 21:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep per above. The Flash {talk} 16:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per everyone above, notable enough album/special. Mr Radio Guy !!! 06:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.