Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Axel Aakerstroem
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 21:55, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Daniel Axel Aakerstroem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I declined a speedy request on this article, but it does not seem as if the subject meets WP:FOOTY or general notability guidelines. Skomorokh 15:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @742 · 16:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @743 · 16:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:55, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - player fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 17:55, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. A lot of unsourced claims in the article, a Google search doesn't yield much. Spiderone (talk) 08:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: There is no AfD tag on the article. BigDom 08:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The article's creator removed it, I have put it back -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: fails ATHLETE and more importantly, fails GNG. BigDom 09:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable subject, fails WP:N and WP:ATHLETE. --Angelo (talk) 12:35, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per WP:ATHLETE. UnitAnode 17:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.