Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Strachman

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 03:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Strachman

edit
Daniel Strachman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:AUTHOR. Author of business books, but has not "created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Google News shows he's quoted periodically on relevant subjects but neither he nor his books have received significant coverage in independent sources per WP:GNG.ScottyBerg (talk) 13:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, while according to a strict interpretation of our guidelines this article should probably be deleted, I believe in this case we should ignore all rules and keep it. Subject appears to be at the very top of his field and has been quoted many times in the press, eg The Washington Post, CNN and so on. Also his wedding was mention in the New York Times, the guy has got to be notable. doomgaze (talk) 01:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep sufficient media attention to meet the threshold of notability. Chester Markel (talk) 05:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep See Articles about him in the NYT One of them actually has the headline: "Head of Tiger Management Considers Taking On a Partner" (July 1, 1997). If the NYT writes an article devoted specifically to the mere possibility of someone taking a parter, that person is clearly very notable. That's substantial coverage way beyond the ordinary. As for reviews, According to Book Review Index, his Essential Stock Picking Strategies. was listed among the Best Investment Books of 2002 by Barrons ( Jan 6, 2003 v82 i52 p31) and reviewed in Reference & Research Book News Nov 2002 v17 p105; Julian Robertson was reviewed in Traders Jan 1, 2005, in Futures (Cedar Falls, Iowa) July 2005 v34 i9 p79 and in Reference & Research Book News Feb 2005 v20 i1 p135 . DGG ( talk ) 02:51, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Eight books published by the ultra-respectable Wiley on hedge funds and like issues makes one a "recognized expert" on an aspect of human enterprise and worthy of encyclopedic biography. Carrite (talk) 14:12, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_Strachman&oldid=1080005105"