- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Bucketsofg 00:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Dantrell Davis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
no notable achievements, completely unreferenced, not sufficiently notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proudlyhumble07 (talk • contribs) 08:35, 21 April 2007
- Keep as likely WP:POINT nomination. Edited for typo. --Charlene 10:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep satisfies WP:BIO Hut 8.5 11:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep satisfies WP:BIO, multiple sources, and the street named after him makes it likely he'll continue to be N - iridescenti (talk to me!) 18:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Not likely to be a POINT nomination, but the article speaks for itself. YechielMan 03:12, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Charlene. John Vandenberg 11:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- keep please close this we can not leave this any longer than necessarily yuckfoo 01:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.