Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Flow (software) (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Darkwind (talk) 13:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Dark Flow (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "Dark Flow (software)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
Delete - Doesn't meet the requirements of software notability guidelines. Jjmitchell314 (talk) 15:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in independent reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 19:11, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Same as last time, fails GNG with no reliable coverage or secondary sourcing available otherwise. czar · · 02:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - software article lacking 3rd party references to establish notability (only refs are developer's sites and a blog); created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 13:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.