Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darkweaver Legacy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 21:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Darkweaver Legacy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not establish that this series meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 06:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I couldn't find anything to show that this self-published series is ultimately notable enough to warrant an article at this point in time. It could redirect to the author's page, but I'm having a bit of trouble finding things to establish notability for him either. I'm a little surprised that his page wasn't nominated as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've PRODed it, as he wouldn't qualify for an WP:A7, but I'll take it to AfD if anyone disputes it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- no sources to establish either notability or verifiability, and even if there were, the article is so cruftily written I would still argue to nuke it and start over. Reyk _YO! 03:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.