Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darth Vader (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:28, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darth Vader (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable piece of software, appears to be a vanity article. Fails Google test. Thedarxide (talk) 20:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given the vandalism by the article creator, I am now pressing for a speedy del Thedarxide (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Software has only just been unvailed to the public, we're experiencing a slight problem with our DNS preventing the website from working. Article will be updated tomorrow (2009/19/10) with citations and more information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Userof2 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 18 October 2009 (UTC) — Userof2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

In doing so please address the issue that the article fails WP:GNG. Google does not indicate any sources that discuss this particular piece of software. Thedarxide (talk) 20:47, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I did find some evidence of it but firstly the source was unrealible and now dead only viewed it by cache. secondly it seems ot eba virus or spyware program.--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 21:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 22:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unable to locate significant coverage in reliable sources. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Article is about an unreleased web browser that will never, ever be released under its alleged current name. This is simultaneously so improbable and so unverifiable that it might warrant speedy deletion as an obvious hoax. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 20:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is some kind of 4chan joke browser. Just delete. 90.232.116.216 (talk) 00:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete, non-notable, not-yet-released software, conflict of interest, self-promotion. SPAM. --GreyCat (talk) 12:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete Olivemountain (talk) 02:43, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.