- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like an advertisement; fails WP:CORP. No sources or even an external link. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 14:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete reads like an ad, probably come COI issues, and company is not notable - Dumelow (talk) 14:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Gavin Collins (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Advertising copy or press release, and the company might or might not pass CORP, but the article is about services. Utgard Loki (talk) 15:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Yet another provider of "solutions"; yet another technology business trying to use Wikipedia for advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, agreed with everyone else here. Article seems far too much like an advert, and pretty much non-notable. — alex.muller (talk • edits) 21:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the company is clearly notable, and seems to have been quite large at one point, with hundreds of news articles in the likes of the Financial Times, but this article is clearly nothing but spam (unless you count the first sentence of the lead). Wikidemo (talk) 12:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.