- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Rambling advert for non-notable website imdateless.com written by Imdateless. -- RHaworth 10:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It isn't rambling so much as setting itself up to be the savior of the world. Melchoir 10:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. starts of as a dictdef and then... well, you can hav spam, spam, spam, eggs, and spam, or spam, spam, chips, spam, spam, and spam, or... Grutness...wha? 11:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Worthless article, as anyone who spends more than 40 hours per week on Wiki... umm.. ignore the previous sentence. D.valued 11:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The page is not well written, not wikilinked, mainly a dictionary definition and probably not valid topic for an encyclopedia. It also may have been originally placed as an ad. Cedars 14:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Ad spam pure and simple, the rest of the content is just to add bulk & make the article acceptable at first glance. Should have been speedy not AfD. —gorgan_almighty 14:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete...after reading this article, there's no mystery at all as to why the original author can't get a date. --MisterHand 15:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. I do not like it, Sam I Am. I do not like green eggs and spam. Durova 17:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.